Skip to main content

Henrietta Maria - the forgotten Queen?

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: The Monarchy

The British Civil Wars has always interested me and International Women's Day  prompted me to focus my blog post on a crucial, controversial, yet often overlooked, figure in British history, Henrietta Maria.

I came across little, other than biographical histories, of the French Queen, to whom Charles I was seemingly devoted. In an era where all women were expected to be obedient and submissive, playing no role in the 'male' sphere of government, this omission may seem understandable. However, the more I delved into Henrietta Maria, the more apparent it became that she contradicted these 17th-century expectations of feminine ideals. And the more she seemed, to me, to represent a head-strong, loyal and driven Queen, who worked tirelessly for the Royalist cause.

Papist Conspiracy?

Considering the lack of detailed history (until more recent works) regarding her involvement in the Civil War, Henrietta Maria was certainly a divisive figure to contemporaries. Even pre-Civil War, Henrietta Maria, being a French Catholic, was not a popular figure in England. However, her unpopularity reached new heights in 1642, as she was now seen as a meddling French Catholic, who had undue influence on the King.

Certainly, Parliamentary propaganda was quick to show her as such. It played particularly on the people's fear of a restoration of Catholicism. This was a constant source of mistrust and suspicion, with Henrietta Maria being accused – throughout the duration of the War- of being involved in a wider 'papist conspiracy'. This was not helped by the Irish rebels in 1641 calling themselves the 'Queen's Army' and claiming to be acting upon Royal orders. By 1644, a Parliamentary pamphlet ‘Great Eclipse of the Sun’ (held at the British Library), saw Parliament still claiming that

‘ …the King was eclipsed by the Queen, and she perswaded him that the Darknesse was Light and that it was better to be a Papist, then a Protestant…’.

Although Charles remained protestant, Henrietta Maria nonetheless sought catholic help in raising troops and money to defend her husband's cause. She turned to her native France for money and Ireland for troops. In a letter unveiled in the King's Cabinet Opened in 1644, Charles wrote to his wife that:

'I give thee power to promise in my name…that I will take away all penal laws against the Roman Catholics in England…I… trust in thee as if thou wert a Protestant…'

Though the extent of her influence over Charles is debateable, Henrietta Maria's own Catholicism was a genuine source of contention between the two sides, causing a greater division than there may have been otherwise.

An 'obstacle' to peace?

Whether it was due to having the 'misfortune' of being both Catholic and French, or simply her tireless efforts in aiding the Royalist cause, Henrietta was regarded by many Parliamentarians as being an 'obstacle' to peace in England.

After attempts by Parliament to negotiate with Charles I in 1642 and 1645, Henrietta Maria made her feelings known to Charles I. The Uxbridge Treaty of 1645 stated that Parliament should have the right to control the militia and foreign policy; the Solemn League and Covenant must be adhered to by Charles; and episcopacy must be abolished. Henrietta Maria – some might argue quite shrewdly - warned her husband that 'if you consent to this, you shall be lost'.

Charles and Henrietta Maria, believing in the Divine Right of the monarch to rule, vehemently opposed any infringement on the rights and power to rule. This would explain Henrietta's relentless efforts to raise money by pawning jewellery in Holland as well as attempting to persuade the Danish crown to lend support. It also explains, however, why Parliament attacked her so vehemently, calling for her impeachment in 1644. Parliament's newspaper, Mercurius Britanicus (collection held at the British Library), in response to Charles ending his letters to Henrietta Maria, as ‘eternally thine’, mockingly claimed that:

‘…himself, breeches and all, are resigned up into her hands for all eternity…it were ridiculous in a private man, much more a King, to submit to the will of his wife…’

She was, in Parliament's view, a scapegoat for Charles' weak government and inability to rule - Charles did not represent the ideals of masculinity, and Henrietta Maria did not conform to the prevailing ideas of a woman's role.

In summary she was one of the constant leading Royalist figures and regardless of the extent of her influence over Charles, her role within the Civil War was of great importance; her perceived influence deepened the division between the two sides. She was a genuine concern for contemporaries, 'invading' the male sphere of politics and threatening the natural order of authority, and, in some ways, contributed to the downfall of her husband. Because of this, she must not be banished to the side-lines of the history of the British Civil Wars.

Page is headed: Mercurius Britanicus: Communicating the affaires of great Britaine for the better information of the people'.
An example of Parliament's newsbook from 1643 (The National Archives reference: SP9/245/19). Other editions are available at the British Library.

Further Reading:

Anon, Great Eclipse of the Sun, or Charles His Waine Overclouded, by the Evill Influences of the Moon, the Malignancie of other Ill-aspected Planets and the Constellations of Retrograde and Irregular Starres (1644). Held at the British Library.

Fairfax, T., The King's Cabinet opened: Or, certain packets of secret letters & papers (London, 1645) Held at the British Library and a copy available to view on Google Books.

White, M. A., Henrietta Maria and the English Civil War (Aldershot, 2006)

Bone, Q., Henrietta Maria: Queen of the Cavaliers (Wiltshere, 1973)

Marshall, R., Henrietta Maria, The Intrepid Queen (London, 1990)

Keep tabs on the past.Sign up for our email alerts.

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by Suzanne Goult posted on

    Fantastic piece on gender in history and its role in the civil war. A great read too!

  2. Comment by Rob Harvey posted on

    Beautifully written, well researched, very informative. Love the work.

  3. Comment by Darren posted on

    Not forgotten by us! We recently named our lovely daughter Henrietta, with this history in mind.

  4. Comment by J Mo posted on

    This is a really fascinating insight. I look forward to your next blog,

  5. Comment by Hazel Kayes posted on

    There is also a biography in hardback of Henrietta Maria by Dominic Pearce, published by Amberley on 15th November 2015.
    Thanks for your attention,
    Hazel Kayes